"Consubstantial? What the hell does that mean? We're trying to get into heaven here, not pass the SATs." Stephen Colbert
___________________________
This first article is an editorial that appeared in the December 19 edition of America Magazine, entitled, "Raise Up the Lowly."
Dawn breaks upon us. The Sun of Justice spreads his warming rays across a dark and icy world. The images of the Christmas season evoke liberation from oppressive times. They announce new life and a new order of things. “Justice and peace embrace.” It is a welcome message at all times, but particularly this year, the fourth since the Great Recession began.
While the official unemployment figures have only just dropped below 9 percent, the unofficial figure may be 16 percent or higher. Recent college graduates cannot find jobs. Discouraged workers have spent years looking for new work without securing it. Many seniors have either lost their pension benefits or have to make due with diminished savings. Governments and families are tightening their belts. Anxiety haunts the land. We sorely need the Light of the Nations to shine into our lives.
Christmas is intended for everyone, but it has a special relevance for the poor and oppressed, for God “lifts up the lowly.” According to the Gospels, Mary identifies herself as a “lowly handmaid.” The shepherds in the Judean hills to whom the angels reveal the good news live on the edge of Israelite society. The Holy Family has to seek out makeshift shelter for the Savior’s birth and then, as refugees, find asylum in Egypt. Later, Jesus begins his own ministry proclaiming “good news to the poor,” and his very first blessings are for the poor and the landless (the meek). These details of the Gospels are intended to appeal to the poor but also to draw the rest of us into their company as the new family of God.
Christmas is time for us to strengthen our bonds of solidarity with the poor, to join in God’s work of raising up the lowly. In the United States of 2011, this solidarity is needed more than ever. In New York City, Mayor Michael Bloomberg is attempting to deny access for single adults to city shelters unless they can prove they have no place else to go. In Maine, where 80 percent of homes are heated by oil, a 60 percent cut in federal subsidies for home heating fuel this year will expose the state’s sizable poor population to the cruelties of a Northeast winter. Using deceptive practices and robosigning legal papaers, banks foreclosed illegally on thousands of homes. After three years of economic distress, we can hardly speak any longer of “a social safety net.” For the poor and resourceless, it is “every man for himself.”
In an environment so hostile to the poor and working people, what can be done to lift up the lowly? How can we participate in Christ’s liberation of the oppressed? First, even as we try to rebuild a dangerously unstable economy, we must resist every effort to blame the victims, whether the poor, workers or Occupy protesters, and instead create a public ethos that favors the common good.
Second, we should demand that government redirect needed spending cuts away from programs for the poor and take them instead from expensive giveaways to commodity producers, hedgefund managers and extravagant purchases of military hardware. If that is not enough, government can institute a Tobin tax on financial transactions, as the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace recently proposed, to fund poverty reduction and economic development.
Last, we can promote economic policies that, unlike those of the last 30 years, hold economic inequalities in check. For decades now the German social market economy has succeeded in producing prosperity with justice. We should be able to do the same in the United States.
For some years it has been fashionable to depoliticize the Gospel, to make Christ’s saving work solely a spiritual liberation from personal sin. In the history of Israel, however, religion and social justice were intermingled. The sin condemned by the prophets was social sin, and God’s fidelity to Israel was conditioned on people and king upholding justice in the land. The infancy narratives echo those same themes. Luke’s Magnificat holds a message of political renewal:
He has put down the mighty from their thrones,
and exalted those of low degree.
He has filled the hungry with good things;
the rich he has sent empty away.
Details of Matthew’s Gospel, like Herod’s fear of John the Baptist and the massacre of the innocents, set Jesus’ birth and public ministry amid a political struggle. Taking up the challenge of social responsibility, therefore, is integral to full faith in the Incarnation. For, as the psalm of the Christmas Mass at Dawn declares:
Light dawns for the just;
and gladness for the upright of heart.
Be glad in the Lord, you just,
and give thanks to his holy name.
___________________________
Italy’s Catholic Church, under fire amid new austerity cuts, open to studying tax exemption
The full, Associated Press article, can be found at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/italys-catholic-church-under-fire-amid-new-austerity-cuts-open-to-studying-tax-exemption/2011/12/10/gIQA6opskO_print.html
Italy’s Catholic Church has shifted gears and shown a willingness to revisit its tax-exempt status amid renewed criticism that much of its vast real estate holdings isn’t subject to local property taxes.
The criticism has grown recently following Premier Mario Monti’s proposal to restore a property tax on first and second homes as part of his sweeping austerity measures to help reign in Italy’s massive debt.
With ordinary Italians being asked to make sacrifices, the church is coming under fire to do its part and give up what some consider an unfair privilege. Critics, most prominently Italy’s Radical Party, charge that the Italian government is missing out on millions of euros in potential taxes.
Cardinal Angelo Bagnasco, the head of the Italian bishops’ conference, said Friday the church would be open to looking at the issue and remedying any individual “abuses” that might have occurred.
“The current norms are correct in that they recognize the social value of activities carried out by many non-profits, among them church ones,” he said. “It’s also correct that if there have been concrete cases in which a tax that should have been paid wasn’t, we should verify the abuse and end it.”
The church has long insisted that it enjoys no special tax privileges, noting that nonprofit organizations, cultural associations, foreign embassies, Lutheran-owned churches and the synagogues of the Jewish community, are exempt from local property taxes.
But in 2006, Parliament extended a property tax exemption to cover buildings that weren’t “exclusively” commercial, such as private health clinics or convents that host pilgrims.
That created a gray area where church-owned properties could conceivably carry out some commercial activities and still retain their tax-exempt status.
Italy’s Radical Party, which is vehemently anti-church, complained to the European Union, charging that the exemptions gave the church an unfair economic advantage over rivals.
The Radicals have exposed how some in the church have taken advantage the wiggle room by using tax-exempt residences for priests as unofficial — and profitable — bed and breakfasts.
The European Commission placed Italy under investigation last year, saying it believed the exemptions could violate EU rules on state subsidies and could distort competition. ...
___________________________
House Republicans criticize White House for denying grant to Catholic group
By Felicia Sonmez,
The full article is available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/house-republicans-criticize-white-house-for-denying-grant-to-catholic-group/2011/12/01/gIQASb2NIO_print.html
House Republicans on Thursday sharply criticized a decision by the Department of Health and Human Services in September to deny a federal grant to a Catholic group that refuses to refer victims of human trafficking for abortion and contraceptive services, with some lawmakers saying that reflected an anti-Catholic bias in the Obama administration.
Democrats on the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform countered that the Republicans were trying to “smear” the White House.
HHS officials testified that they acted appropriately in awarding the $4.5 million in funding to three other nonprofit groups even though reviewers had scored those applications below that of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.
The officials disputed the accusation of anti-Catholic bias, noting that in the days after denying the contract, the agency awarded the organization a separate $19 million grant. And they said the agency had provided more grant money to Catholic organizations during the Obama administration than in the final three years of the George W. Bush administration. ...
___________________________
The Catholic Church must change and adapt in modern world
Frank O'Connor is a community columnist for The Sault Star, and his full article can be found at: http://www.saultstar.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?e=3400581
The Christmas season is upon us, and in the Catholic community our faith beliefs mirror what is happening in the natural world during early winter. We are waiting for the new light of the world to shine upon a darkened planet.
This light is in the form of the child, born to the Virgin Mary, in a barn more than 2,000 years ago. With this one child's singular birth was born the reality that our creator, God, loves mankind unconditionally, and asks us to love one another unconditionally.
Fast forward 2,000 years, and in the real world of the modern Catholic Church, particularly in the Western Hemisphere, this sense of new birth and awakening seems to be lost. Church attendance has dwindled to all-time lows, parishes are closing or clustering, teaching seminaries have little to no enrolment, and priests are aging and retiring with no replacements in sight.
These problems did not suddenly descended upon the Catholic Church, but rather, they have slowly slipped in over the last 50 years.
As global communication technology improved, and values in Western societies changed, the manner in which Catholics view their church has also changed. What has not been so receptive to change is the manner by which Rome and the Papacy have governed its church.
Many Catholics peg the root of these problems on two factors.
First, some feel that priests should marry and have families. Second, there is growing sentiment that women should be eligible to become parish priests.
Compounding the issue have been controversies involving priests and their abuse of power. Recently, our own Sault Star covered another story of alleged physical and sexual abuse.
Recognizing that there is a problem is one of the first steps toward rehabilitation, and I think many within the church now realize there is a problem. Finding the root of the issue and possible solutions should become a priority for Pope Benedict XVI, and his cardinals and bishops.
... If the Catholic Church is open to some level of free thinking, then change is inevitable. The leaders of the church are not infallible, and the time for change appears to be upon us.
May the peace and joy of this Christmas season be present in all your lives. Merry Christmas friends.
___________________________
Homosexuality among church leaders discussed at Jesuit university event
... For the 100 or so theologians, members of the clergy, women religious, students and others who braved the heavy snow Oct. 29 to attend “The Care of Souls: Sexual Diversity, Celibacy, and Ministry” conference at Jesuit-run Fairfield University, the day was packed densely with history, stories and plenty of questions.
It was the final event of a four-part series of talks titled “More Than a Monologue: Sexual Diversity and the Catholic Church.” The series aimed at expanding the conversation on lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender issues within the Catholic church.
“Unfortunately, any speech about Catholicism, sexuality and clerical power is so vexed, so scandalous, that I can’t begin the meditation without underlining three more cautions against misunderstanding,” said the first speaker, Mark Jordan, a professor of divinity at Harvard University Divinity School.
“First, I’ll be talking about the configuration of power in relation to sexuality within ecclesial systems, not about all of the individual lives under those systems. It is, of course, possible to lead a Christian life of unstinting love, of vivid witness, of embodied grace under the present system of Roman power,” Jordan said.
“Second caution: I want to talk about this clerical power as homoerotic. By this I don’t mean to imply anything about the sexual acts, real or fantasized, of those who participate in this power,” he said. “This form of clerical power seems to me the object, and the instrument, of sharp longing, of desire.
“Third and final caution: I speak of the configuration of homoerotic power in the Roman Catholic clergy at particular times and places. There are partial repetitions across church history, I think, and there are striking structural similarities across church cultures in a given time. But if we know anything about the Catholic church, it is that it is not one thing. It is a complex network of thousands of different communities.”
The full article is available at:
http://ncronline.org/news/people/fairfield-event-concludes-sexuality-talks
___________________________
The following letter was written
to the Catholic bishops of Minnesota
by Herbert W. Chilstrom, former
presiding bishop of the Evangelical
Lutheran Church in America.
To My Brothers:
In 1976 I was elected a Lutheran bishop in Minnesota – one of seven such Lutheran leaders in the state. Over the next years one of the highlights of my time in office was the annual noon-to-noon retreat with our eight Catholic counterparts in the state.
The bond that developed between us was deep and respectful. We shared our differences; we celebrated our likenesses. My friendship with Archbishop John Roach and Bishop Raymond Lucker, in particular, is a blessing I will treasure as long as I live.
May I share a word with all of you who now lead the Roman Catholic community of faith in Minnesota?
First, I would go to the wall to defend your right to work for the adoption of the so-called marriage protection amendment. Having said that, I must tell you that I believe you are making a significant mistake.
Over my 35 years as an active and retired bishop I have come to know hundreds of gay and lesbian persons. I have yet to meet even one who is opposed to the marriage of one man and one woman. After all, they are the daughters and sons of such unions.
What they cannot understand is why church leaders would oppose their fundamental desire and right to be in partnership with someone they love and respect who happens to be of the same gender and sexual orientation. They don't understand why they should not enjoy all the rights and privileges their straight counterparts take for granted.
More than a half century ago Father Francis Gilligan spoke out for equality for African American citizens of Minnesota. Though many argued on the basis of the Bible that these neighbors were inferior to others, Gilligan fought tirelessly for justice for these brothers and sisters.
In our generation homosexual persons are subject to the same discrimination. Their detractors often use the Bible and tradition as weapons of choice.
Is it not time for religious leaders, walking in the footsteps of Father Gilligan, to do the same for another minority, neighbors who are as responsible as our African American sisters and brothers?
I also suggest that you ask yourselves an important question: If the amendment is passed, will it make one particle of difference in our common culture in Minnesota? I don't think so.
Responsible lesbian and gay persons will continue to seek companionship with those they love. This law will only work to drive many of them deeper into closets of anonymity.
Instead, why not welcome them into our communities of faith where they can work side by side with us as equal partners?
Let me put out a challenge to each of you brothers. Invite 15 gay and lesbian persons from your respective areas, one at a time, to spend two hours with you.
Thirty hours are a pittance compared to the time you are investing to promote adoption of the marriage amendment. Use the time, not for confession, but to listen to them describe what it is like to live in our culture in Minnesota.
Hear as they tell you what it means be a child of God and a faithful member of your church, persons who happen to be gay or lesbian through no choice of their own. I can promise you, based on my experience, that your heart will be deeply moved by what you hear.
When you have finished your time with these sisters and brothers in Christ, spend a quiet hour reflecting on a single question: "As I understand the heart of my Savior Jesus, how would he treat these sons and daughters of my church?"
___________________________
Scholars see 'breach' between bishops, theologians
Joshua J. McElwee is an NCR staff writer.
Aftershocks of the U.S. bishops' doctrine committee's moves against theologian Sr. Elizabeth Johnson spread Monday as the College Theology Society issued a statement saying the bishops' moves represent a "fundamental breach" in the call for dialogue in the church and wounds the "entire community of Catholic theologians."
The Monday statement from the College Theology Society, which represents lay and religious undergraduate theology faculty, is the latest in a months-long saga over Johnson's book Quest for the Living God: Mapping Frontiers in the Theology of God, which the bishops first blasted in March.
In late October, the bishops' Committee on Doctrine reconfirmed their condemnation, which touched off questions of why the bishops hadn't first attempted dialogue with the St. Joseph sister and what that might mean for the practice of theology.
The theology society's statement, signed by its seven board members and four officers and addressed to the society's membership, expresses "sadness and grave concern" over the bishops' October statement because the bishops went forward "without entering into a process of dialogue with [Johnson] about the issues being raised."
"The course of action taken by the Committee on Doctrine represents a fundamental breach in the call for dialogue within the church and in particular between theologians and bishops, a call that is one of the hallmarks of the documents of the Second Vatican Council," reads the statement, which was posted to the society's website.
The full article can be read at:
http://ncronline.org/news/theology/scholars-see-breach-between-bishops-theologians